Search for: All records

The optical fiber integral field unit (IFU) built to feed the near infrared (NIR) spectrograph for the 11-meter Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) has undergone prototyping and rigorous performance testing at Wash- burn Astronomical Laboratories of the University of Wisconsin-Madison Astronomy Department. The 43 m length of 256 fibers which make up the object and sky arrays and spares are routed from the SALT payload down into the spectrograph room in four separate cables. The IFU covers 344 arcsec2 on the sky, with the object array spanning a 552 arcsec2 near-rectangular area at roughly 56% fill-factor. Companion papers describe the mechanical design of the fiber cable that mitigates potential sources of mechanical strain on the optical fiber (Smith et al.) and details of the spectrograph (Wolf et al.). Here we present the results of the performance testing of various test cables as well as performance testing and end-to-end mapping of the fully-assembled science cable. The fiber optics experience an extreme temperature gradient at the ingress to the instrument enclosure held at -40 ◦C during operation. We find an increase in focal ratio degradation (FRD) when holding progressively longer lengths of test fiber at reduced temperature. However, we confirm that this temperature dependent FRD is negligible for our designed length of cold fiber. We also find negligible contributions to FRD from the rubber seal that breaches the room temperature strain relief box and the cold instrument enclosure. Our measure- ments characterize performance including the effects of internal fiber inhomogeneities, stress induced from fiber handling and termination, as well as any imperfections from end-polishing. We present the room-temperature laboratory performance measurements of the fully-assembled science cable; the effective total throughput the fiber cable delivers to the spectrograph collimator is 81±2.5% across all fibers accounting for all losses. 

Abstract Sustaining the organisms, ecosystems and processes that underpin human wellbeing is necessary to achieve sustainable development. Here we define critical natural assets as the natural and semi-natural ecosystems that provide 90% of the total current magnitude of 14 types of nature’s contributions to people (NCP), and we map the global locations of these critical natural assets at 2 km resolution. Critical natural assets for maintaining local-scale NCP (12 of the 14 NCP) account for 30% of total global land area and 24% of national territorial waters, while 44% of land area is required to also maintain two global-scale NCP (carbon storage and moisture recycling). These areas overlap substantially with cultural diversity (areas containing 96% of global languages) and biodiversity (covering area requirements for 73% of birds and 66% of mammals). At least 87% of the world’s population live in the areas benefitting from critical natural assets for local-scale NCP, while only 16% live on the lands containing these assets. Many of the NCP mapped here are left out of international agreements focused on conserving species or mitigating climate change, yet this analysis shows that explicitly prioritizing critical natural assets and the NCP they provide could simultaneously advance development, climate and conservation goals. 

To meet the ambitious objectives of biodiversity and climate conventions, the international community requires clarity on how these objectives can be operationalized spatially and how multiple targets can be pursued concurrently. To support goal setting and the implementation of international strategies and action plans, spatial guidance is needed to identify which land areas have the potential to generate the greatest synergies between conserving biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people. Here we present results from a joint optimization that minimizes the number of threatened species, maximizes carbon retention and water quality regulation, and ranks terrestrial conservation priorities globally. We found that selecting the top-ranked 30% and 50% of terrestrial land area would conserve respectively 60.7% and 85.3% of the estimated total carbon stock and 66% and 89.8% of all clean water, in addition to meeting conservation targets for 57.9% and 79% of all species considered. Our data and prioritization further suggest that adequately conserving all species considered (vertebrates and plants) would require giving conservation attention to ~70% of the terrestrial land surface. If priority was given to biodiversity only, managing 30% of optimally located land area for conservation may be sufficient to meet conservation targets for 81.3% of the terrestrial plant and vertebrate species considered. Our results provide a global assessment of where land could be optimally managed for conservation. We discuss how such a spatial prioritization framework can support the implementation of the biodiversity and climate conventions.